Rejoice. (Grimalkin Press): It’s interesting to note that
Minneapolis-based, Autoptic Co-Founder, sous chef-cum-small press publisher
extraordinaire Jordan Shiveley named his new project “Rejoice.” and it has that
damn period after it. I believe this is a deliberate move that signals an entry
into a world of deadpan humor. I once heard someone say that using exclamation
marks (or any excessive punctuation) in your writing is like laughing at your
own jokes. You get more mileage out of restraint than you do from any
over-the-top adornment. The restraint allows the audience a sense of discovery
and prohibits the writer/artist from essentially spelling it all out for the
reader in a prescriptive manner. Yes, less is more, and this is a dynamic
Shiveley intuitively understands. Shiveley presents a straight-faced story
billed in library-style classification as “Comics/Mouse Erotica/Calamity” sans
any punctuation that would fall into that trap. Everything about the book
subtly screams world-weary dry presentation of facts, and avoids the overt
insinuation of parody or satire, and that absence is what actually creates all
the funny, all the introspection, and all the emotion.
This restraint, this uncluttering of his words with the
unnecessary, is as smart artistically as Shiveley’s phenomenal March 29, 1912
was in the way it eschewed dialogue completely in favor of full audience
engagement. For example, take the index page in the back of Rejoice. It
exhaustively lists entries for things like “Callous Disregard pg. 3, 4, 10, 12,
25, 30, 31, 32” or “Dawning Premonition of Disaster pg. 1, 26, 33” or “My
Twenties Encapsulated pg. 13” and just presents them dutifully without comment.
While I think there might(?) be a typo in one long entry, where commas between
numbers are suddenly periods for some reason, it’s otherwise one of the
smartest, most subtly funny things I’ve seen in quite some time. There’s also
a stray typo on “questionaire” (and the utility of correcting typos during
reviews is something Shiveley and I have bantered back and forth about, so I’m now
scrambling to proofread this review for typos), but don’t pay any attention to
that. There are more pertinent things afoot in Rejoice.
Rejoice. is largely concerned with the contention between the
wonderful and the meaningless in life. “Rejoice.” Period. The characters are
doing anything but. As a pure objet d’art, Rejoice. was printed at Zak Sally’s
La Mano Press on risograph, with patterned pages that encapsulate minimalist
mouse misadventures as they navigate the choices we’re presented with in life.
What I like about Shiveley’s art the most is that he isn’t afraid to sling ink
when the story calls for it. There’s the dark void of the unknown hole in wall
the mice encounter, perfectly represented by that big expanse of black ink. I also like how their eyes are just tiny round circles of
ink, yet they somehow are able to convey apprehension, agitation, or longing.
The hole with unseen mousetraps lurking inside becomes a
stand-in for how we deal with danger, there are riffs on certainty and
self-doubt, submitting to the routine semi-post-hipster life of “flat-fronted
trousers” and “farmer’s markets” vs. exposure to new adventures, and being
caught up by those ultimately meaningless distractions in life vs. finding the
time to build meaningful relationships with people. The mice are contemplating
finding happiness through external things, “the right combination of words,
people, places,” and the viability of that. Their “Supermouse” dreams touch on
feeling as if we’re destined for something greater vs. the “is this all there
is?” phenomenon in life. I could go on, but Shiveley is so very poetic with
words and these feelings at times, maybe best exemplified by: “I want to settle
into happiness like we are old lovers in a chance meeting… and we have just
remembered each other’s names.”
If I dared to venture a personal guess, I might suggest a
small-scale mid-life crisis of sorts (though I don’t know exactly how old
Shiveley is) has seeped into his work. As he nails down the big job, the new
place, the steady g/f, the flourishing side business/hobby, maybe hitting that
point in life we all experience where you feel you’re certainly on track, but
start to question if that’s the right track for you specifically, the track you
always envisioned for yourself, which admittedly is an instance where reality
typically deviates from your original vision. Grade A.
2 Comments:
The last paragraph of this review. Thank you for that.
Thanks, Elkin!
Post a Comment
<< Home